Hon. Will O'Neill is the former Mayor of Newport Beach, CA, current Chairman of the Republican Party of Orange County, and regular commentator on CNN and Fox News. In addition to his top ticket endorsements, Will recommends the following candidates for election in local Newport Beach offices: Joe Stapleton for Newport Beach City Council, District 1; Erik Weigand for Newpirt Beach City Council, District 3; Robyn Grant for Newpirt Beach City Council, District 4; Lauren Kleiman for Newpirt Beach City Council, District 6; Xerxez Calilung for Coast Community College Area 5; Craig Holiday for Newport-Mesa USD, District 4
California Governor
California Lieutenant Governor
California Secretary of State
California Controller
California Treasurer
California Attorney General
California State Board of Equalization · District 4
California State Senate · District 36
California State Assembly · District 72
California State Assembly · District 73
California Supreme Court Associate Justice (Groban)
As for judges, we are voting on their retention. That means we aren't voting between people, but only whether we want to keep the appellate and CA Supreme Court Justices in place. Even where I disagree with their opinions, I'm not aware of any on the ballot whose ethics or demeanor justify removal. And even if we did think removal would be prudent, Newsom would get to choose the replacement
California Supreme Court Associate Justice (Evans)
As for judges, we are voting on their retention. That means we aren't voting between people, but only whether we want to keep the appellate and CA Supreme Court Justices in place. Even where I disagree with their opinions, I'm not aware of any on the ballot whose ethics or demeanor justify removal. And even if we did think removal would be prudent, Newsom would get to choose the replacement
California Court of Appeals Associate Justice - District 4, Division 1 (Bermudez)
As for judges, we are voting on their retention. That means we aren't voting between people, but only whether we want to keep the appellate and CA Supreme Court Justices in place. Even where I disagree with their opinions, I'm not aware of any on the ballot whose ethics or demeanor justify removal. And even if we did think removal would be prudent, Newsom would get to choose the replacement
California Court of Appeals Associate Justice - District 4, Division 1 (Castillo)
As for judges, we are voting on their retention. That means we aren't voting between people, but only whether we want to keep the appellate and CA Supreme Court Justices in place. Even where I disagree with their opinions, I'm not aware of any on the ballot whose ethics or demeanor justify removal. And even if we did think removal would be prudent, Newsom would get to choose the replacement
California Court of Appeals Associate Justice - District 4, Division 1 (Dato)
As for judges, we are voting on their retention. That means we aren't voting between people, but only whether we want to keep the appellate and CA Supreme Court Justices in place. Even where I disagree with their opinions, I'm not aware of any on the ballot whose ethics or demeanor justify removal. And even if we did think removal would be prudent, Newsom would get to choose the replacement
California Court of Appeals Associate Justice - District 4, Division 1 (Do)
As for judges, we are voting on their retention. That means we aren't voting between people, but only whether we want to keep the appellate and CA Supreme Court Justices in place. Even where I disagree with their opinions, I'm not aware of any on the ballot whose ethics or demeanor justify removal. And even if we did think removal would be prudent, Newsom would get to choose the replacement
California Court of Appeals Associate Justice - District 4, Division 1 (Kelety)
As for judges, we are voting on their retention. That means we aren't voting between people, but only whether we want to keep the appellate and CA Supreme Court Justices in place. Even where I disagree with their opinions, I'm not aware of any on the ballot whose ethics or demeanor justify removal. And even if we did think removal would be prudent, Newsom would get to choose the replacement
California Court of Appeals Associate Justice - District 4, Division 1 (Rodriguez)
As for judges, we are voting on their retention. That means we aren't voting between people, but only whether we want to keep the appellate and CA Supreme Court Justices in place. Even where I disagree with their opinions, I'm not aware of any on the ballot whose ethics or demeanor justify removal. And even if we did think removal would be prudent, Newsom would get to choose the replacement
California Court of Appeals Associate Justice - District 4, Division 1 (Rubin)
As for judges, we are voting on their retention. That means we aren't voting between people, but only whether we want to keep the appellate and CA Supreme Court Justices in place. Even where I disagree with their opinions, I'm not aware of any on the ballot whose ethics or demeanor justify removal. And even if we did think removal would be prudent, Newsom would get to choose the replacement
California Court of Appeals Associate Justice - District 4, Division 2 (Lee)
As for judges, we are voting on their retention. That means we aren't voting between people, but only whether we want to keep the appellate and CA Supreme Court Justices in place. Even where I disagree with their opinions, I'm not aware of any on the ballot whose ethics or demeanor justify removal. And even if we did think removal would be prudent, Newsom would get to choose the replacement
California Court of Appeals Associate Justice - District 4, Division 3 (Delaney)
As for judges, we are voting on their retention. That means we aren't voting between people, but only whether we want to keep the appellate and CA Supreme Court Justices in place. Even where I disagree with their opinions, I'm not aware of any on the ballot whose ethics or demeanor justify removal. And even if we did think removal would be prudent, Newsom would get to choose the replacement
California Court of Appeals Associate Justice - District 4, Division 3 (Gooding)
As for judges, we are voting on their retention. That means we aren't voting between people, but only whether we want to keep the appellate and CA Supreme Court Justices in place. Even where I disagree with their opinions, I'm not aware of any on the ballot whose ethics or demeanor justify removal. And even if we did think removal would be prudent, Newsom would get to choose the replacement
California Court of Appeals Associate Justice - District 4, Division 3 (Macaulay)
As for judges, we are voting on their retention. That means we aren't voting between people, but only whether we want to keep the appellate and CA Supreme Court Justices in place. Even where I disagree with their opinions, I'm not aware of any on the ballot whose ethics or demeanor justify removal. And even if we did think removal would be prudent, Newsom would get to choose the replacement
California Court of Appeals Associate Justice - District 4, Division 3 (Scott)
As for judges, we are voting on their retention. That means we aren't voting between people, but only whether we want to keep the appellate and CA Supreme Court Justices in place. Even where I disagree with their opinions, I'm not aware of any on the ballot whose ethics or demeanor justify removal. And even if we did think removal would be prudent, Newsom would get to choose the replacement
California Court of Appeals Associate Justice - District 4, Division 3 (Servino)
As for judges, we are voting on their retention. That means we aren't voting between people, but only whether we want to keep the appellate and CA Supreme Court Justices in place. Even where I disagree with their opinions, I'm not aware of any on the ballot whose ethics or demeanor justify removal. And even if we did think removal would be prudent, Newsom would get to choose the replacement
California Court of Appeals Presiding Justice - District 4, Division 3 (Motoike)
As for judges, we are voting on their retention. That means we aren't voting between people, but only whether we want to keep the appellate and CA Supreme Court Justices in place. Even where I disagree with their opinions, I'm not aware of any on the ballot whose ethics or demeanor justify removal. And even if we did think removal would be prudent, Newsom would get to choose the replacement
California Court of Appeals Associate Justice - District 4, Division 2 (Raphael)
As for judges, we are voting on their retention. That means we aren't voting between people, but only whether we want to keep the appellate and CA Supreme Court Justices in place. Even where I disagree with their opinions, I'm not aware of any on the ballot whose ethics or demeanor justify removal. And even if we did think removal would be prudent, Newsom would get to choose the replacement
California Superintendent of Public Instruction
U.S. House · California District 47
Orange County Board of Supervisors · District 5
Recommended: vote no
Recommended: vote no
Recommended: vote no
Recommended: vote no
Recommended: vote no
Recommended: vote no
Recommended: vote no
Recommended: vote no
Recommended: vote no
Recommended: vote yes
Recommended: vote no
Recommended: vote yes
Recommended: vote yes
Recommended: vote yes
Recommended: vote no
Recommended: vote yes
