Erin Ploss Campoamor (Erin's Picks) 2026 voter guide

"En las elecciones primarias, apoyé a Michael Tubbs, quien quedó en cuarto lugar. Ahora la decisión es sencilla: Fiona Ma es la única demócrata que queda en esta contienda y se enfrenta a Gloria Romero, una exsenadora estatal demócrata que se hizo republicana en 2024 y es aliada política del candidato a gobernador respaldado por Trump, Steve Hilton, quien le pidió que se uniera a su fórmula electoral. Romero es transfóbica, está alineada con el Partido Republicano en cuanto a la libre elección de escuela y las políticas sobre el COVID-19, y cuenta con el respaldo del Partido Republicano de California. Ma parece inteligente y tiene mucha experiencia. Según LAist, se ha desempeñado como tesorera estatal de California desde 2019 y, antes de eso, integró la Junta de Igualación, fue supervisora de San Francisco y pasó cuatro mandatos en la Legislatura estatal, donde llegó a ocupar el segundo puesto en el liderazgo de la Asamblea. Mis reservas en las elecciones primarias surgieron del hecho de que, en 2021, una persona que antes trabajaba en impuestos estatales presentó una demanda por acoso sexual contra Ma. El estado llegó a un acuerdo en el caso en 2024, y Ma negó las acusaciones y no admitió haber cometido ninguna irregularidad. De verdad espero que esté diciendo la verdad, porque ahora se enfrenta a una republicana, así que es la única opción demócrata en esta contienda. Fiona Ma cuenta con el respaldo del Partido Demócrata de California, Equality California, California Labor Federation, State Building and Construction Trades Council y AFSCME."

"Apoyo a Eleni Kounalakis porque es la única demócrata en esta contienda, y parece inteligente, con experiencia y cuenta con el respaldo de personas a quienes respeto. Según el sitio web oficial de California: “Eleni Kounalakis juró como la 50.a vicegobernadora de California ante el gobernador Gavin Newsom el January 7th, 2019. Es la primera mujer elegida vicegobernadora de California. Como californiana nativa, visitó cada uno de los 58 condados del estado durante su histórica campaña. Además de sus funciones como vicegobernadora, Kounalakis es la representante de California para Asuntos Internacionales y Comercio, nombrada por el gobernador Gavin Newsom mediante orden ejecutiva. De 2010 a 2013, Kounalakis se desempeñó como embajadora del presidente Obama ante la República de Hungría.” Eleni Kounalakis cuenta con el respaldo del senador Alex Padilla, las representantes Nancy Pelosi, Robert Garcia, Lateefah Simon, Laura Friedman y Sydney Kamlager-Dove, la ex presidenta de LAUSD Jackie Goldberg, East Area Progressive Democrats, Equality California, California Environmental Voters y Sierra Club."

“Apoyo a Jessica Caloza porque es la única demócrata candidata, está calificada y cuenta con el respaldo de personas que respeto. De su sitio web: “Jessica es una dedicada servidora pública que trabajó para el presidente Obama, ayudando a que las escuelas públicas con fondos insuficientes obtuvieran más recursos. Como comisionada de Obras Públicas de Los Ángeles, Jessica amplió los empleos sindicalizados bien pagados, aumentó los salarios de los trabajadores y exigió igualdad salarial para las mujeres, a la vez que aumentó la transparencia y la rendición de cuentas. Como subjefa de gabinete del fiscal general de California, Rob Bonta, Jessica ha trabajado para reducir el crimen y la violencia armada, tomar medidas audaces para proteger el medio ambiente y ayudar a las víctimas de agresión sexual a recibir justicia.” Jessica Caloza cuenta con el respaldo de las representantes Judy Chu, Ted Lieu y Sydney Kamlager-Dove, California Federation of Teachers, Abundant Housing Los Angeles, Planned Parenthood LA, SEIU y Equality California.”

“Sitting justices are nearly always reelected. In California… voters once removed three members of the state Supreme Court in 1986 over the death penalty. However, no California appellate court justice has lost a retention election since the system began in the 1930s… You’ll come across two job titles in these races: Associate Justice and Presiding Justice. A presiding justice handles the administrative side of the court, sets policies and essentially acts as a supervisor, in addition to reviewing cases with associate justices. When a new appellate court justice needs to be appointed, the presiding justice in that district takes part in the approval process… More voter resources: ‘Opinions’ (Judicial Council of California): This is a free lookup where you can read the California Courts of Appeal’s decisions. Appellate Court Primer (Los Angeles County Bar Association): Helpful background on how the California Courts of Appeal work. Their website also lists the bios for all of the justices, in case you want to do further research.

“Sitting justices are nearly always reelected. In California… voters once removed three members of the state Supreme Court in 1986 over the death penalty. However, no California appellate court justice has lost a retention election since the system began in the 1930s… You’ll come across two job titles in these races: Associate Justice and Presiding Justice. A presiding justice handles the administrative side of the court, sets policies and essentially acts as a supervisor, in addition to reviewing cases with associate justices. When a new appellate court justice needs to be appointed, the presiding justice in that district takes part in the approval process… More voter resources: ‘Opinions’ (Judicial Council of California): This is a free lookup where you can read the California Courts of Appeal’s decisions. Appellate Court Primer (Los Angeles County Bar Association): Helpful background on how the California Courts of Appeal work. Their website also lists the bios for all of the justices, in case you want to do further research.

“Sitting justices are nearly always reelected. In California… voters once removed three members of the state Supreme Court in 1986 over the death penalty. However, no California appellate court justice has lost a retention election since the system began in the 1930s… You’ll come across two job titles in these races: Associate Justice and Presiding Justice. A presiding justice handles the administrative side of the court, sets policies and essentially acts as a supervisor, in addition to reviewing cases with associate justices. When a new appellate court justice needs to be appointed, the presiding justice in that district takes part in the approval process… More voter resources: ‘Opinions’ (Judicial Council of California): This is a free lookup where you can read the California Courts of Appeal’s decisions. Appellate Court Primer (Los Angeles County Bar Association): Helpful background on how the California Courts of Appeal work. Their website also lists the bios for all of the justices, in case you want to do further research.

“Sitting justices are nearly always reelected. In California… voters once removed three members of the state Supreme Court in 1986 over the death penalty. However, no California appellate court justice has lost a retention election since the system began in the 1930s… You’ll come across two job titles in these races: Associate Justice and Presiding Justice. A presiding justice handles the administrative side of the court, sets policies and essentially acts as a supervisor, in addition to reviewing cases with associate justices. When a new appellate court justice needs to be appointed, the presiding justice in that district takes part in the approval process… More voter resources: ‘Opinions’ (Judicial Council of California): This is a free lookup where you can read the California Courts of Appeal’s decisions. Appellate Court Primer (Los Angeles County Bar Association): Helpful background on how the California Courts of Appeal work. Their website also lists the bios for all of the justices, in case you want to do further research.

“Sitting justices are nearly always reelected. In California… voters once removed three members of the state Supreme Court in 1986 over the death penalty. However, no California appellate court justice has lost a retention election since the system began in the 1930s… You’ll come across two job titles in these races: Associate Justice and Presiding Justice. A presiding justice handles the administrative side of the court, sets policies and essentially acts as a supervisor, in addition to reviewing cases with associate justices. When a new appellate court justice needs to be appointed, the presiding justice in that district takes part in the approval process… More voter resources: ‘Opinions’ (Judicial Council of California): This is a free lookup where you can read the California Courts of Appeal’s decisions. Appellate Court Primer (Los Angeles County Bar Association): Helpful background on how the California Courts of Appeal work. Their website also lists the bios for all of the justices, in case you want to do further research.

“Sitting justices are nearly always reelected. In California… voters once removed three members of the state Supreme Court in 1986 over the death penalty. However, no California appellate court justice has lost a retention election since the system began in the 1930s… You’ll come across two job titles in these races: Associate Justice and Presiding Justice. A presiding justice handles the administrative side of the court, sets policies and essentially acts as a supervisor, in addition to reviewing cases with associate justices. When a new appellate court justice needs to be appointed, the presiding justice in that district takes part in the approval process… More voter resources: ‘Opinions’ (Judicial Council of California): This is a free lookup where you can read the California Courts of Appeal’s decisions. Appellate Court Primer (Los Angeles County Bar Association): Helpful background on how the California Courts of Appeal work. Their website also lists the bios for all of the justices, in case you want to do further research.

“Sitting justices are nearly always reelected. In California… voters once removed three members of the state Supreme Court in 1986 over the death penalty. However, no California appellate court justice has lost a retention election since the system began in the 1930s… You’ll come across two job titles in these races: Associate Justice and Presiding Justice. A presiding justice handles the administrative side of the court, sets policies and essentially acts as a supervisor, in addition to reviewing cases with associate justices. When a new appellate court justice needs to be appointed, the presiding justice in that district takes part in the approval process… More voter resources: ‘Opinions’ (Judicial Council of California): This is a free lookup where you can read the California Courts of Appeal’s decisions. Appellate Court Primer (Los Angeles County Bar Association): Helpful background on how the California Courts of Appeal work. Their website also lists the bios for all of the justices, in case you want to do further research.

“Sitting justices are nearly always reelected. In California… voters once removed three members of the state Supreme Court in 1986 over the death penalty. However, no California appellate court justice has lost a retention election since the system began in the 1930s… You’ll come across two job titles in these races: Associate Justice and Presiding Justice. A presiding justice handles the administrative side of the court, sets policies and essentially acts as a supervisor, in addition to reviewing cases with associate justices. When a new appellate court justice needs to be appointed, the presiding justice in that district takes part in the approval process… More voter resources: ‘Opinions’ (Judicial Council of California): This is a free lookup where you can read the California Courts of Appeal’s decisions. Appellate Court Primer (Los Angeles County Bar Association): Helpful background on how the California Courts of Appeal work. Their website also lists the bios for all of the justices, in case you want to do further research.

“Sitting justices are nearly always reelected. In California… voters once removed three members of the state Supreme Court in 1986 over the death penalty. However, no California appellate court justice has lost a retention election since the system began in the 1930s… You’ll come across two job titles in these races: Associate Justice and Presiding Justice. A presiding justice handles the administrative side of the court, sets policies and essentially acts as a supervisor, in addition to reviewing cases with associate justices. When a new appellate court justice needs to be appointed, the presiding justice in that district takes part in the approval process… More voter resources: ‘Opinions’ (Judicial Council of California): This is a free lookup where you can read the California Courts of Appeal’s decisions. Appellate Court Primer (Los Angeles County Bar Association): Helpful background on how the California Courts of Appeal work. Their website also lists the bios for all of the justices, in case you want to do further research.

“Sitting justices are nearly always reelected. In California… voters once removed three members of the state Supreme Court in 1986 over the death penalty. However, no California appellate court justice has lost a retention election since the system began in the 1930s… You’ll come across two job titles in these races: Associate Justice and Presiding Justice. A presiding justice handles the administrative side of the court, sets policies and essentially acts as a supervisor, in addition to reviewing cases with associate justices. When a new appellate court justice needs to be appointed, the presiding justice in that district takes part in the approval process… More voter resources: ‘Opinions’ (Judicial Council of California): This is a free lookup where you can read the California Courts of Appeal’s decisions. Appellate Court Primer (Los Angeles County Bar Association): Helpful background on how the California Courts of Appeal work. Their website also lists the bios for all of the justices, in case you want to do further research.

“Sitting justices are nearly always reelected. In California… voters once removed three members of the state Supreme Court in 1986 over the death penalty. However, no California appellate court justice has lost a retention election since the system began in the 1930s… You’ll come across two job titles in these races: Associate Justice and Presiding Justice. A presiding justice handles the administrative side of the court, sets policies and essentially acts as a supervisor, in addition to reviewing cases with associate justices. When a new appellate court justice needs to be appointed, the presiding justice in that district takes part in the approval process… More voter resources: ‘Opinions’ (Judicial Council of California): This is a free lookup where you can read the California Courts of Appeal’s decisions. Appellate Court Primer (Los Angeles County Bar Association): Helpful background on how the California Courts of Appeal work. Their website also lists the bios for all of the justices, in case you want to do further research.

“Sitting justices are nearly always reelected. In California… voters once removed three members of the state Supreme Court in 1986 over the death penalty. However, no California appellate court justice has lost a retention election since the system began in the 1930s… You’ll come across two job titles in these races: Associate Justice and Presiding Justice. A presiding justice handles the administrative side of the court, sets policies and essentially acts as a supervisor, in addition to reviewing cases with associate justices. When a new appellate court justice needs to be appointed, the presiding justice in that district takes part in the approval process… More voter resources: ‘Opinions’ (Judicial Council of California): This is a free lookup where you can read the California Courts of Appeal’s decisions. Appellate Court Primer (Los Angeles County Bar Association): Helpful background on how the California Courts of Appeal work. Their website also lists the bios for all of the justices, in case you want to do further research.

“Sitting justices are nearly always reelected. In California… voters once removed three members of the state Supreme Court in 1986 over the death penalty. However, no California appellate court justice has lost a retention election since the system began in the 1930s… You’ll come across two job titles in these races: Associate Justice and Presiding Justice. A presiding justice handles the administrative side of the court, sets policies and essentially acts as a supervisor, in addition to reviewing cases with associate justices. When a new appellate court justice needs to be appointed, the presiding justice in that district takes part in the approval process… More voter resources: ‘Opinions’ (Judicial Council of California): This is a free lookup where you can read the California Courts of Appeal’s decisions. Appellate Court Primer (Los Angeles County Bar Association): Helpful background on how the California Courts of Appeal work. Their website also lists the bios for all of the justices, in case you want to do further research.

“Sitting justices are nearly always reelected. In California… voters once removed three members of the state Supreme Court in 1986 over the death penalty. However, no California appellate court justice has lost a retention election since the system began in the 1930s… You’ll come across two job titles in these races: Associate Justice and Presiding Justice. A presiding justice handles the administrative side of the court, sets policies and essentially acts as a supervisor, in addition to reviewing cases with associate justices. When a new appellate court justice needs to be appointed, the presiding justice in that district takes part in the approval process… More voter resources: ‘Opinions’ (Judicial Council of California): This is a free lookup where you can read the California Courts of Appeal’s decisions. Appellate Court Primer (Los Angeles County Bar Association): Helpful background on how the California Courts of Appeal work. Their website also lists the bios for all of the justices, in case you want to do further research.

“Sitting justices are nearly always reelected. In California… voters once removed three members of the state Supreme Court in 1986 over the death penalty. However, no California appellate court justice has lost a retention election since the system began in the 1930s… You’ll come across two job titles in these races: Associate Justice and Presiding Justice. A presiding justice handles the administrative side of the court, sets policies and essentially acts as a supervisor, in addition to reviewing cases with associate justices. When a new appellate court justice needs to be appointed, the presiding justice in that district takes part in the approval process… More voter resources: ‘Opinions’ (Judicial Council of California): This is a free lookup where you can read the California Courts of Appeal’s decisions. Appellate Court Primer (Los Angeles County Bar Association): Helpful background on how the California Courts of Appeal work. Their website also lists the bios for all of the justices, in case you want to do further research.

“Sitting justices are nearly always reelected. In California… voters once removed three members of the state Supreme Court in 1986 over the death penalty. However, no California appellate court justice has lost a retention election since the system began in the 1930s… You’ll come across two job titles in these races: Associate Justice and Presiding Justice. A presiding justice handles the administrative side of the court, sets policies and essentially acts as a supervisor, in addition to reviewing cases with associate justices. When a new appellate court justice needs to be appointed, the presiding justice in that district takes part in the approval process… More voter resources: ‘Opinions’ (Judicial Council of California): This is a free lookup where you can read the California Courts of Appeal’s decisions. Appellate Court Primer (Los Angeles County Bar Association): Helpful background on how the California Courts of Appeal work. Their website also lists the bios for all of the justices, in case you want to do further research.

“Sitting justices are nearly always reelected. In California… voters once removed three members of the state Supreme Court in 1986 over the death penalty. However, no California appellate court justice has lost a retention election since the system began in the 1930s… You’ll come across two job titles in these races: Associate Justice and Presiding Justice. A presiding justice handles the administrative side of the court, sets policies and essentially acts as a supervisor, in addition to reviewing cases with associate justices. When a new appellate court justice needs to be appointed, the presiding justice in that district takes part in the approval process… More voter resources: ‘Opinions’ (Judicial Council of California): This is a free lookup where you can read the California Courts of Appeal’s decisions. Appellate Court Primer (Los Angeles County Bar Association): Helpful background on how the California Courts of Appeal work. Their website also lists the bios for all of the justices, in case you want to do further research.

“Sitting justices are nearly always reelected. In California… voters once removed three members of the state Supreme Court in 1986 over the death penalty. However, no California appellate court justice has lost a retention election since the system began in the 1930s… You’ll come across two job titles in these races: Associate Justice and Presiding Justice. A presiding justice handles the administrative side of the court, sets policies and essentially acts as a supervisor, in addition to reviewing cases with associate justices. When a new appellate court justice needs to be appointed, the presiding justice in that district takes part in the approval process… More voter resources: ‘Opinions’ (Judicial Council of California): This is a free lookup where you can read the California Courts of Appeal’s decisions. Appellate Court Primer (Los Angeles County Bar Association): Helpful background on how the California Courts of Appeal work. Their website also lists the bios for all of the justices, in case you want to do further research.

“Sitting justices are nearly always reelected. In California… voters once removed three members of the state Supreme Court in 1986 over the death penalty. However, no California appellate court justice has lost a retention election since the system began in the 1930s… You’ll come across two job titles in these races: Associate Justice and Presiding Justice. A presiding justice handles the administrative side of the court, sets policies and essentially acts as a supervisor, in addition to reviewing cases with associate justices. When a new appellate court justice needs to be appointed, the presiding justice in that district takes part in the approval process… More voter resources: ‘Opinions’ (Judicial Council of California): This is a free lookup where you can read the California Courts of Appeal’s decisions. Appellate Court Primer (Los Angeles County Bar Association): Helpful background on how the California Courts of Appeal work. Their website also lists the bios for all of the justices, in case you want to do further research.

Apoyo a Richard Barrera porque es inteligente, tiene experiencia y cuenta con el respaldo de personas a quienes respeto. Ha formado parte de la Junta Escolar Unificada de San Diego durante 18 años, cinco de ellos como presidente, y ayudó a dirigir el segundo distrito escolar más grande del estado. Su trayectoria allí le ha valido el respaldo de prácticamente todas las personas defensoras de la educación pública que se puedan imaginar, incluida la Asociación de Maestros de California y miembros de juntas escolares de todo el estado. También se postula contra Sonja Shaw, una republicana transfóbica partidaria de Trump, lo que hace que esta contienda sea especialmente crucial. Según su sitio web: “Hijo de un padre inmigrante de Colombia y nieto de inmigrantes de la isla Ellis, la historia de Richard Barrera es una de sacrificio, oportunidad y el poder transformador de la educación pública… Nacido en San Diego, Richard asistió a escuelas públicas desde el kínder hasta la universidad... Después de graduarse, Richard regresó a casa y pasó años organizando a trabajadores del hogar, trabajadores de la salud y enfermeras que luchaban por salarios justos, mejores condiciones y respeto en el trabajo. Gracias a ese trabajo, vio de primera mano cuán profundamente las escuelas públicas moldeaban el futuro de las comunidades a las que servía. Decidido a garantizar que cada niño tuviera acceso a las mismas oportunidades que habían moldeado su propia vida, se postuló para la Junta Escolar Unificada de San Diego (SDUSD).” Según Ballotpedia: “Barrera tiene experiencia como organizador comunitario y líder en relaciones laborales. Obtuvo una licenciatura en historia de Estados Unidos de la Universidad de California en San Diego. Posteriormente, obtuvo una maestría en políticas públicas de la Universidad de Harvard."

"Apoyo a Estuardo Mazariegos en esta contienda entre demócratas. Fue una decisión difícil en las primarias porque había tantos candidatos, pero al final parecía que solo había dos verdaderos contendientes: Estuardo Mazariegos y José Ugarte. Y ahora son los únicos dos que quedan. Entre ellos, se han dividido los principales respaldos de manera bastante equitativa, y los más progresistas han ido a Estuardo Mazariegos. También vale la pena señalar que hubo una investigación de ética sobre la falta de Ugarte de reportar sus ingresos previos como cabildero, lo cual afirmó que fue un “error administrativo”. Estoy proporcionando información sobre ambos candidatos para que pueda decidir por su cuenta. ESTUARDO MAZARIEGOS Según Ground Game / Knock LA: “Estuardo Mazariegos es exactamente el tipo de persona que el Concejo Municipal de Los Ángeles necesita más. Inmigrante de Guatemala que creció en South Central, Estuardo ha dedicado su vida a su comunidad. A lo largo de más de dos décadas de organización comunitaria, ha llegado a ser codirector de Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment (ACCE), uno de los grupos de la clase trabajadora más eficaces del estado y una parte clave de la coalición detrás de victorias como la creación de la Ordenanza contra el Acoso de Inquilinos. Mazariegos ha dedicado su carrera a luchar para que las comunidades de inquilinos de bajos ingresos, a menudo ignoradas, tengan voz en el Ayuntamiento y en Sacramento… Sus objetivos principales son garantizar calles seguras y accesibles; construir viviendas asequibles y proteger a los inquilinos; y crear espacios verdes y mejoras climáticas en CD 9 para superar décadas de injusticia ambiental y falta de inversión… Si quiere un candidato que ha dedicado su vida a servir a la gente y no a los grupos de interés político, Estuardo Mazariegos es la única opción. Su combinación de experiencia en organización comunitaria, conocimiento de políticas públicas y comprensión local es extremadamente poco común.” Estuardo Mazariegos cuenta con el respaldo de la concejal municipal Eunisses Hernandez, la integrante de la Junta Escolar Karla Griego, UTLA, SEIU, National Union of Healthcare, DSA-LA, Ground Game LA y LA Forward."

"Apoyo a Marissa Roy en esta contienda demócrata contra demócrata, porque es la candidata más calificada y cuenta con el respaldo de personas que respeto. Según LA Forward, su oponente, John McKinney, está “respaldado por el Partido Republicano, el sindicato policial LAPPL, el fiscal de distrito republicano Nathan Hochman y nada menos que $3 millones en gastos de afuera de Airbnb solo durante las primarias”. Según su sitio web: “Marissa Roy es una angelina de toda la vida que ha dedicado su carrera a luchar por los derechos civiles y la protección de los consumidores. La decisión de Marissa de seguir una carrera en el servicio público fue inspirada por ver el poder de la ley para luchar por la gente: cuando se aprobó la Propuesta 8 en 2008 y se les negó a los californianos LGBTQ+ el derecho a casarse, incluido su hermano menor, Marissa vio cómo la Oficina del Abogado de la Ciudad de San Francisco lideró con éxito la lucha para anular la Propuesta 8 y restablecer la igualdad matrimonial para miles de personas. Desde entonces, Marissa ha dedicado su carrera jurídica a proteger a las familias trabajadoras, los inquilinos, los inmigrantes y todos los californianos, desde sus inicios en la oficina del Abogado de la Ciudad hasta su cargo actual como fiscal general adjunta”. Marissa Roy cuenta con el respaldo de los senadores Alex Padilla y Adam Schiff, el fiscal general Rob Bonta, las supervisoras Hilda Solis y Lindsey Horvath, la expresidenta de LAUSD Jackie Goldberg, el Partido Demócrata del Condado de Los Ángeles, Courage California, East Area Progressive Democrats, LA Forward y Knock LA."

Apoyo a David Ross porque está calificado, coincido con sus valores y cuenta con el respaldo de personas que respeto. Según LA Forward (escrito durante las primarias): “Le damos la ventaja en esta contienda a Ross, quien cuenta con más apoyo progresista, incluida una recomendación de La Defensa”. David Ross cuenta con el respaldo de la expresidenta de LAUSD Jackie Goldberg, La Defensa, East Area Progressive Democrats, LA Forward y Ground Game LA. Calificación de LACBA.org: Calificado

I’m supporting Anna Slotky Reitano, because she is qualified, I am aligned with her values, and she is endorsed by people I respect. According to LA Forward (written during the primary): “We recommend you vote for Anna S. Reitano... We supported Reitano, when she was a member of Defenders of Justice slate in 2022 and we urge you to vote for her again this time. She served as a public defender for a decade and for the last two years, she’s worked Justice and Safety Division of LA County Counsel’s office, where she supervises civil litigation and advises county departments. We appreciated her well-rounded legal background.” Anna Slotky Reitano is endorsed by Former LAUSD President Jackie Goldberg, National Women's Political Caucus, Stonewall Democratic Club, East Area Progressive Democrats, LA Forward, and Ground Game LA. Rating by LACBA.org: Qualified

There is some disagreement on the left about this measure, which would establish an impartial binding arbitration process for labor disputes for certain county employees. However, even though it may have started off with good intentions, I am definitely voting NO. According to LAist: “Public safety employee unions and L.A. County officials are asking voters to change the county charter to require labor disputes with workers, including firefighters and sheriff’s deputies, to be resolved by three-member arbitration panels. The Board of Supervisors put the measure on the ballot to “level the playing field” in the contract negotiations between the county and unionized public safety employees, who are prohibited by law from going on strike.” According to Ground Game/ Knock LA: “The primary impact of Measure A would be to allow any deadlock in union negotiations to be sent to binding arbitration. In a most fundamental sense, this would allow the major public safety units to force contract agreements that ignore the broader financial and policy needs of the county, putting at risk county priorities and the needs of other unions. We do not need to give the corrupt Sheriff’s Department any more power over the county’s budget. Vote no.” According to LA Forward: “Top funders include the Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs, the Los Angeles County Firefighters Local 1014, and the Los Angeles County Professional Peace Officers Association. Even though binding arbitration looks like a fair process with respect to the individual issues it would settle, there are many good reasons not to do this. This measure applies to many categories of public safety employees, but it’s worth considering with respect to the most controversial — sheriff’s deputies.

Everyone on the left is in agreement that the “Ethics Commission and Community Investment Budget Allocation Charter Amendment” is a good idea. According to Ground Game / Knock LA: “This one is vitally important. By passing this measure, LA County would be locking in the independence of and funding for the County Ethics Commission and Office of Ethics Compliance… Passing Measure E means more power for ethics investigation and more strength for the Commission to enforce penalties.” According to LAist: “Measure E would carve out the independence of — and funding for — a new ethics commission and compliance office for the county government of Los Angeles County. The measure would increase the independence of the upcoming County Ethics Commission and Office of Ethics Compliance by granting it the power to investigate misconduct by county officials, candidates, lobbyists and contractors; issue subpoenas; and fine violators up to $15,000 per offense. It would be funded by a guaranteed minimum budget of $14.3 million a year to protect its independence. It also locks in the county’s 10% general fund set-aside for community investment and alternatives to incarceration.” Measure E is supported by Supervisor Lindsey Horvath, Los Angeles County Democratic Party, League of Women Voters of L.A. County, California Clean Money, California Common Cause, AAPI Equity Alliance, LA Forward, East Area Progressive Democrats, and Knock LA.

Most people on the left are in agreement that voting YES on FD is the right choice, because it would provide more funding for fighting fires. According to Knock LA: “This one is simple. Using a 0.5% sales tax (raising the sales tax from 10.25% to 10.75%), Measure FD would raise funds for the LA Fire Department. No surprises here. As the climate crisis grows and dangerous fire conditions continue to increase, more funding for the fire department is a positive. Los Angeles faces horrific wildfire risks across a huge territory, and we need to grow our fire department staff and facilities and take proactive steps to prevent fires and harden our infrastructure. We do need to offer our recommendation with some caveats. First, a sales tax is a regressive tax. Lower income Angelenos will pay more as a percentage of their income than the rich. Second, we simply cannot fund everything forever by carving out fractional cents of sales tax and earmarking it for different departments; this is not a way to manage a budget, and will eventually hit the limit of its usefulness… In the meantime, we will offer a reserved “yes” on FD.” Measure FD is supported by LA Forward and Knock LA.

Most people on the left are in agreement that voting YES on LA is the right choice, because it would help reform the city’s charter. According to LA Forward: “Measure LA comes out of the comprehensive Charter reform process Los Angeles undertook over the past year, the first major examination of the City Charter in decades. Across numerous public meetings, there was widespread support for several of the changes now packaged under Measure LA, especially those on long-term infrastructure planning and reforms to the City’s budgeting process. The final package of reform was placed on the ballot by the City Council on a 13–0 vote, with two members absent.” Measure LA is supported by LA Forward and Knock LA.

"La mayoría de las personas de izquierda coinciden en que votar SÍ por PL es la opción correcta, porque ayudaría a reformar la carta constitutiva de la ciudad. Según LA Forward: “De aprobarse, la Medida PL implementaría reformas propuestas por la Comisión de la Carta Constitutiva de la Ciudad al proceso de uso de terrenos de la Ciudad. El mayor cambio implicaría la disolución de las Comisiones de Planificación de Área de la Ciudad: estas siete comisiones regionales toman decisiones sobre pequeños proyectos en la región que les corresponde y atienden apelaciones de decisiones tomadas por el personal del City Planning Department. En su lugar, se crearía una nueva Comisión de Apelaciones Vecinales. Esta nueva Comisión tendría siete integrantes y consideraría apelaciones de decisiones tomadas por el personal del Departamento de Planificación de la Ciudad. La Ciudad seguiría teniendo una Comisión de Planificación de la Ciudad, el organismo que considera proyectos de gran escala propuestos dentro de la Ciudad.” La Medida PL cuenta con el apoyo de LA Forward y Knock LA."

Most people on the left are in agreement that voting YES on PRK is the right choice, because it would help provide funding for local parks. According to LA Forward: “Measure PRK is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to transform our parks system for working families across Los Angeles – restoring clean beaches, safe playgrounds and facilities, expanding recreational and community programming that keeps kids and seniors connected, safe and active, and ensuring every Angeleno has a welcoming place to gather with family and friends, build community, and stay cool. Measure PRK does this by increasing the parks guaranteed budget over 10 years, so our parks can give Angelenos the services they need.” Measure PRK is supported by Los Angeles County Democratic Party, Stonewall Young Democrats, LA Forward and Knock LA.

Most people on the left are in agreement that voting YES on PRT is the right choice, because it would expand community oversight of Los Angeles' airports and invest in our waterfront spaces. According to LAist: “Measure PRT would alter the makeup of the Board of Airport Commissioners, increasing the number of members who live in communities near LAX and Van Nuys Airport. Other changes would update the rules around leases for the Airports Department, Department of Water and Power and Harbor Department. The measure would also require the Harbor Department to continue its practice of dedicating funding each year to public waterfront projects.” Measure PRT is supported by Los Angeles County Democratic Party, Stonewall Young Democrats, LA Forward and Knock LA.

Almost everyone on the left is in agreement that we should vote YES on Measure SC because it would amend the city charter to clarify campaign finance rules for Board of Education elections. According to Knock LA: “This one is quite specific. If passed, it would do what it says on the tin: clarify campaign finance rules for Board of Education elections by making them match the same rules as the Mayor. That’s fine. It could be interesting in the future if voters also pass Prop 4 — maybe matching funds could be extended to the School Board race as well.” Measure SC is supported by La Defensa and Knock LA.

There is some disagreement on the left on Measure TE, because it authorizes a one-time tax exemption for homes that were damaged or destroyed by the Palisades Fire. Even though I feel terrible for those home owners and their loss, I am voting NO on this measure because of the precedent it sets. According to Knock LA: “Measure TE is an attempt to create tax exemptions for people whose homes burned in the Palisades Fire should they wish to sell their property. If passed, it would allow these certain residential property owners to be exempt from Measure ULA, which taxes real estate sales that surpass $5.4 million. This exemption would run for five years from the date of the fire, expiring in 2030. We want to be clear about something: the loss of a home during a fire is a traumatic and terrible occurrence. The Palisades Fire was a devastating event, and the rebuilding process will be long and difficult. We also believe that if passed, Measure TE would set a precedent for wealthy homeowners to opt out of taxes, an option that is not available to people in Altadena who lost their homes in the Eaton Fire. If an individual’s property sells for more than $5.4 million, even as a bare lot, it’s not right to exempt that sale from a tax. $5.4 million is a lot of money for a piece of land without a house on it! To protect the integrity of Measure ULA, we do not support creating carve outs to the mansion tax. The recommendation is no.” Measure TE is opposed by LA Forward, La Defensa and Knock LA.

Everyone on the left is in agreement that voting YES on Prop 1 is a good idea, because it would provide much needed funding for solving the housing crisis. According to LAist: “This measure asks voters to approve $11.25 billion in state bonds for various affordable housing strategies. The revenue would go toward the construction of new income-restricted apartments, supportive housing for tenants overcoming homelessness, mortgage assistance for veterans and a number of other programs.” Yes on Prop 1 is endorsed by Gov. Gavin Newsom, Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas, Former LAUSD President Jackie Goldberg, California Democratic Party, Courage California, League of Women Voters of California, Affordable Housing Alliance, ACLU California Action, Equality California, East Area Progressive Democrats and Knock LA.

Everyone on the left is in agreement that voting YES on Prop 2 is a good idea, because it would allow California to save more money in its “rainy day” fund. According to Ground Game / Knock LA: “If approved, this proposition would amend the California State charter to move 20% of general fund tax revenue into reserves — also known as the Budget Stabilization Account (BSA) — increasing the ceiling from the previous 10%. Approval would also authorize spending tax revenue to pay down the state’s federal unemployment insurance debt, totaling $20 billion, through a change in how “excess” capital gains revenues are calculated. The proposition would change the relationship between deposits into the BSA and the state spending cap, commonly called the Gann Limit. Put in place by voter-approved ballot initiative in 1979, the current spending cap law limits growth in state and local government spending funded by tax revenue and requires that the government will remit funds to taxpayers when the limit is exceeded. Under current law, deposits into state reserves are counted as dollars spent and dollars withdrawn are not counted as spending. The approval of Proposition 2 would codify the inverse: deposits into reserves would not count as spending, while withdrawals would. More money in California’s savings account is a good thing. Period. This proposition is opposed by right-wing groups like Reform California, an ultra-conservative PAC that is chaired by conservative activist and sentient frown line Carl DeMaio. So take from that what you will.” Yes on Prop 2 is endorsed by Senators Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff, Gov. Gavin Newsom, Former LAUSD President Jackie Goldberg, California Democratic Party, Courage California, California Environmental Voters, East Area Progressive Democrats and Knock LA.

Everyone on the left is in agreement that voting YES on Prop 3 is a good idea, because it would extend the top marginal tax rates in order to provide more funding for education. According to League of Women Voters of California: “Proposition 3 would protect funding for schools, health care, and other essential services by keeping California’s current income tax rates on the highest-income 2 percent of taxpayers. Without Prop 3, those rates would fall in 2031, reducing state revenue by an estimated $5 billion to $15 billion each year. Prop 3 would not change anyone’s tax rate today. About 40 percent of this revenue goes to schools and community colleges. The rest helps fund Medi-Cal and other health and human services, other essential public services, and state budget reserves. California should not give its highest-income residents a multi-billion-dollar tax cut while schools, health care, and other essential services face serious financial pressure. Prop 3 simply asks the top 2 percent to keep paying the same rates they already pay. The League strongly supports the measure because it protects vital services, helps California weather economic downturns, and keeps the state’s tax system fair.” According to Former LAUSD President Jackie Goldberg: “This is a VERY IMPORTANT MEASURE as it makes income taxes on higher earners permanent to fund Education and Healthcare. Put on the ballot by the California Teachers Association, extends a tax passed in 2012 for individuals earning more than $360,000 to 12.3% and 12.3 % for joint filers earning more than $721,000. It will raise between $5-15 billion a year, which is about 3-10% of the K-12 Education spending. Only opposition is right-wing Reform California and the right-wing California Taxpayers Association. Proponents are organizing door-to-door and have raised more than $47 million in support.

Everyone on the left is in agreement that voting YES on Prop 4 is a good idea, because it would repeal California’s ban on public financing of campaigns. According to Ground Game / Knock LA: “Prop 4 would end a ban on public financing for campaigns and allow local governments to build programs that provide political candidates with public funds. State law allows charter cities to distribute public funds for campaigns, but not state and county governments. If passed, Prop 4 would require the creation of expenditure limits and other criteria for candidates seeking public funds. Campaigns would be prohibited from using the money for legal defense fees, fines, or repaying personal loans. This proposition doesn’t create a public financing plan, but makes it possible for us to fight for the creation of an equitable system. In a world where money still sways elections, public financing has been a powerful tool for working people to participate in politics. If you follow Los Angeles politics — which you probably do, you’re reading Knock LA — you’ve seen matching funds make it possible for progressive challengers to compete with the big money of the Los Angeles Police Protective League (LAPPL) or the landlord lobby. At the same time, many of our favorites in other cities or running for state legislature have been swamped by wealthy interests. Prop 4 would help us open our elections to candidates who do not have personal fortunes or a network of rich donors. Vote yes.” Yes on Prop 4 is endorsed by Former LAUSD President Jackie Goldberg, California Democratic Party, League of Women Voters of California, Courage California, East Area Progressive Democrats and Knock LA.

Everyone on the left is in agreement that voting YES on Prop 5 is a good idea, because it would revise the laws around recalling elected officials, in order to avoid its misuse in attempts to circumvent the electoral process. According to League of Women Voters of California: “California’s recall gives voters a way to remove a corrupt or failed official. It should never become a back door to state office for a replacement candidate propped up by only a small fraction of voters. However, that is exactly what today’s recall rules allow, since the same ballot that decides removal also determines a replacement based on whoever gets the most votes, even if that’s far short of a majority. Prop 5 fixes a built-in contradiction in the recall process. Voters are asked to remove an officer by majority vote, then hand that same office to a replacement chosen by whomever gets the most votes, often in a field crowded with dozens of candidates and with no requirement that the winner reach half the vote. That’s a loophole that can easily be exploited…. Prop 5 restores the recall to its proper purpose: deciding whether an official should remain in office. It shuts down that back door with one clean fix: removing the replacement candidate vote from the recall ballot itself. If a recall succeeds, the vacancy is filled through succession, appointment, or a later election decided by real majority support. These are the same rules used to fill any other vacancy in state government… Prop 5 protects accountability while ending a system that can hand power to a candidate most voters never chose.” Yes on Prop 5 is endorsed by Former LAUSD President Jackie Goldberg, California Democratic Party, League of Women Voters of California, East Area Progressive Democrats and Knock LA.

There’s a lot of disagreement on the left about this proposition, with people and organizations I trust on both sides. I am still weighing the pros and cons (which I describe below), but for now I am pretty sure that I’m voting NO. According to LAist: “Proposition 37 would create a state loan program to help middle-income Californians buy newly built homes and condos.” I assumed I’d vote yes, since that sounds like a great idea and it’s endorsed by many organizations I trust. But I was surprised to see that the League of Women Voters of California recommends voting no, and former LAUSD President Jackie Goldberg says she is undecided, leaning no. So I checked Ballotpedia to see who is funding the campaign. Prop 37 is backed by Building a Better California, a committee that has raised over $100 million to support it and other measures, and to oppose Prop 40 (the “Billionaire Tax”). Building a Better California is largely funded by billionaires such as Sergey Brin, L. John Doerr III, and Eric Schmidt. For these reasons, I’m voting no, but I’ve laid out the facts below so you can decide for yourself. VOTING “YES” According to Ground Game / Knock LA: “If passed, Prop 37 would create a second mortgage program for qualified homebuyers on qualified homes, with $25 billion in bonds to fund the program… Proponents of Prop 37 include, unsurprisingly, realtors and the construction trades… The most likely beneficiary… would be a household with stable middle-income work but without the savings for a down payment… Think of it as an industry subsidy, providing demand-side funding to encourage new construction; realtors like it because it increases home sales, unions like it because it increases construction work. We’re not opposed to this proposition, but it is hardly a cure for the housing crisis.

There’s a lot of disagreement on the left about this proposition. It looks good on paper and has the support of some great organizations (like Affordable Housing Alliance, Equality California, and East Area Progressive Democrats), but upon further examination, I am voting NO. According to LAist: “Proposition 38 allows California to borrow $8.4 billion in bonds to pay for the study of the human immune system and to develop treatments that help it fight diseases… But the measure has sparked controversy over who backs it — and who stands to benefit if it passes. Opponents of Prop. 38 say it would seemingly steer $4.2 billion — half the bond funds — to one research group. A CalMatters analysis of Prop. 38 found that only one organization would probably qualify for the partner research institute under the measure’s current language: the California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy. The billionaire co-founder of the California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy, Gary K. Michelson, is one of the two ultrawealthy chief backers of Proposition 38, CalMatters reports. Opponents question why, with several viable immunology research institutes in the state, the measure would apparently single out just one recipient.” According to the League of Women Voters of California: “Medical research can save lives, but Prop 38 is the wrong way to fund it. It would authorize $8.4 billion in borrowing for immunology and immunotherapy research and require the state to make $500 million to $600 million in annual debt payments for about 20 years. Those payments would come from the General Fund, which also pays for schools, health care, and other public services.” Prop 38 is opposed by League of Women Voters of California, Courage California, and Knock LA.

Everyone on the left is in agreement that voting NO on Prop 39 is a good idea, because it would make voter ID laws more restrictive and therefore harder for people to vote. According to Ground Game / Knock LA: “It’s a big, resounding “no” on this one. Prop 39 would require all California voters to show a government-issued ID when voting in person and to provide the last four digits of a government-issued ID when registering to vote by mail. Election officials would also be mandated to maintain “accurate” voter registration lists and to ensure that all voters on said lists are US citizens. As California law stands, voters are already required to show a government-issued ID and social security number when registering to vote, but are not required to do so at polling places. This is an anti-democratic move by conservative lawmakers who continue to project about election fraud. It is another way for them to make voting more difficult and to create barriers for young people, people with disabilities, and low-income voters. This measure is supported by the California Republican Party and billionaire-backed Reform California. Tell them to go to hell and vote no.” Prop 39 is opposed by California Democratic Party, Affordable Housing Alliance, Equality California, California Federation of Labor Unions, and East Area Progressive Democrats.

Many people on the left agree that voting NO on Prop 41 is the right choice, because its sole purpose is to make taxation more complicated and block Prop 40 from going into effect. According to Blue Voter Guide: “A “no” vote opposes this initiative to require financial and performance audits for state laws or ballot initiatives levying new special taxes after January 1, 2026.” According to Ground Game / Knock LA: “Off the bat, it’s a no. Prop 41 was introduced as a way to nullify and defeat Prop 40. It contains language that could make taxation more complicated, but that’s secondary to its main purpose. Along with its companion ballot measure Prop 42, it contains language stating that if this measure receives more votes than Prop 40, then Prop 40 does not go into effect, even if Prop 40 passes. It was put on the ballot to confuse the electorate. No for this one and for the following one, too.” According to Cal Matters: “The chief opponent is SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West… The union argues that Prop. 41 is designed to trick voters into unknowingly blocking a wealth tax on billionaires. Prop. 41 isn’t about auditing waste in public programs, the union says; instead it’s a way for billionaires to avoid paying taxes once on their huge wealth.” Prop 41 is opposed by Former LAUSD President Jackie Goldberg, California Democratic Party, California Federation of Labor Unions, ACLU California Action, League of Women Voters of California, United Farm Workers, Affordable Housing Alliance, SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West, LA Forward, Courage California, East Area Progressive Democrats, Sacramento Bee, San Francisco Chronicle, and Knock LA.

Many people on the left agree that voting NO on Prop 42 is the right choice, because its sole purpose is to ban new taxes on personal property and block Prop 40 from going into effect. According to Blue Voter Guide: “A “no” vote opposes this initiative to amend the California Constitution to prohibit the enactment of: new taxes after January 1, 2026, on ownership or control of retirement holdings, individually-owned assets, and other forms of personal savings.” According to Ground Game / Knock LA: “This measure would create a ban on new taxes that target personal property, and was, similarly to Prop 41, designed to block the billionaire tax. Like its counterpart, Prop 42 would make Prop 40 null and void if the former receives more votes than the latter. Also like 41, this measure was put on the ballot by the billionaires who think they can put one over on the voters. No on both 41 and 42.” Prop 42 is opposed by Former LAUSD President Jackie Goldberg, California Democratic Party, California Federation of Labor Unions, ACLU California Action, League of Women Voters of California, United Farm Workers, Affordable Housing Alliance, SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West, LA Forward, Courage California, East Area Progressive Democrats, Sacramento Bee, San Francisco Chronicle, and Knock LA.

There is some disagreement on the left about this proposition. It looks good on paper and has the support of some great organizations, but upon further examination, I am voting NO. That said, I’ve laid out the facts below so that you can decide for yourself. VOTING “YES” According to Cal Matters: “Supporters, led by the health workers union SEIU-UHW, argue that clinics should spend more on direct patient care and less on executive pay and overhead. With federal cuts under H.R. 1 — which is expected to leave many more uninsured — looming, supporters say it is especially critical for clinics to prioritize patient care now.” Prop 44 is supported by SEIU-UHW, AFL-CIO of Alameda County, and California Federation of Labor Unions. VOTING “NO” According to the League of Women Voters of California: “Prop 44 could reduce access to health care for Californians who already have the fewest options. It would impose a rigid spending requirement on nonprofit safety-net clinics serving low-income and uninsured patients. Clinics that cannot meet the requirement could face substantial penalties or even close, shifting patients to other public safety-net providers and increasing public costs… A rule intended to direct more money to patient care should not put the safety net itself at risk. Prop 44 could worsen health disparities rather than reduce them.” Prop 44 is opposed by Former LAUSD President Jackie Goldberg, California Democratic Party, California Teachers Association, League of Women Voters of California, LA Forward, Courage California, East Area Progressive Democrats, Sacramento Bee, San Francisco Chronicle, and Knock LA.

Everyone on the left is in agreement that voting NO on Prop 45 is the right choice, because it would weaken California’s environmental review law, fast-track projects developers label ‘essential’ and limit the public’s ability to challenge them in court. According to the Blue Voter Guide: “A “no” vote opposes this initiative to make changes to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which governs state and local government agencies’ review process for determining potential environmental impacts and mitigation solutions of proposed construction projects.” According to Former LAUSD President Jackie Goldberg: “This measure would make a 365 day limit on environmental reviews for projects such as schools, hospitals, roads, bridges, infrastructure and housing. And it would limit judicial review to 270 days. Measure was sponsored by the California Chamber of Commerce and is opposed by… Clean Air Coalition, Clean Water Action, Sierra Club California, the National Wildlife Federation and me. Proponents will spend $38 million to pass it, while those opposing this attempt to weaken our clean air and clean water efforts only have $17.1 million.” Prop 45 is opposed by Former LAUSD President Jackie Goldberg, California Democratic Party, California Labor Federation, California League of Women Voters, Western Center on Law and Poverty, Clean Air Coalition, Clean Water Action, Sierra Club California, the National Wildlife Federation, LA Forward, Courage California, East Area Progressive Democrats and Knock LA.